Archive for the ‘News’ Category

Murdoch to keep WSJ access fees

Via Jemima Kiss at the Guardian, Rupert Murdoch has backtracked on plans to open up the Wall Street Journal’s paid-for content. In fact, subscribers can expect to pay more for it:

Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos yesterday, Murdoch said his plans for the newly-acquired publication still involved expanding the audience for general news.

But the chairman and chief executive of News Corporation, which concluded its takeover of Wall Street Journal owner Dow Jones last month, indicated that WSJ.com users would probably have to pay more for content that remained behind the subscription wall.

“We’re sort of dividing it up. Those things you can get more or less as a commodity on different sites about finance, that will certainly be free at the Wall Street Journal,” he added.

More: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jan/25/digitalmedia.rupertmurdoch?gusrc=rss&feed=media

Tags:

No Comments


Google to buy New York Times?

Via John Ellis at RealClearMarkets, is Google about to buy The New York Times?

What’s in it for Google? Well, for one thing, it’s cheap. Sell off the New England properties and the real cost is $3 billion. That’s not much money to buy one of the premier brands of the information age. It also comes with some excellent real estate, which further reduces the risk. And happily enough, it will probably get cheaper in the coming months. So the price is definitely right.

Second, Google is embarking on an ambitious mobile platform. It is buying wireless spectrum and will soon introduce Google Mobile. In so doing, it is entering into an arena where the established players have hired (almost) every lobbyist and (almost) every law firm with expertise in telecommunications in Washington, DC and in virtually every state capital. Owning the New York Times would level that playing field in one fell swoop.

This would also fit in with John Battelle’s idea that Google is making a play for the second click.

And while it’s not in the same league as Google, let’s not forget that the NYT Company acquired About.com in March 2005, which (according to their own info) is ‘a top 10 content site‘.

And speaking of content, Google would also be buying the highly respected New York Times Syndicate and News Service, giving it tremendous reach outside of the US.

More: http://www.realclearmarkets.com/articles/2008/01/might_google_buy_the_new_york.html

Tags: ,

No Comments


When social networking turns bad

Via the Telegraph, social networking site Bebo finds itself at the centre of a media storm:

Detectives fear a bizarre suicide craze is sweeping through teenagers in a small town fuelled by chat on social networking sites after seven friends took their own lives.

As well as the deaths during the last 12 months, several more have attempted suicide and police fear they are being driven by a desire to achieve prestige by having a memorial website set up in their name.

More: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/01/23/nsuicide123.xml

In fairness to Bebo, they do offer some ‘fun animations‘ for youngsters using the site, along with a bunch of links to teaching materials, how-to guides, advice for parents, etc.

Tags:

No Comments


Google search experiments

Fancy taking Google’s experimental search for a spin?

Alternative views, keyword suggestions, keyboard shortcuts, left-hand search navigation, right-hand contextual search navigation…anyone remember how Google started out?

Tags:

No Comments


Web publishing: Just do it!

Via Publishing2.0, Scott Karp writes on the fundamental difference between print and web journalism:

I realized that the problem isn’t just a lack of understanding about blogging, or social networking…The problem is, framed more broadly, an inability to understand what I like to call “web-native publishing” — but let’s just call it web publishing, because complexity is the root cause problem here.

The fundamental [difference] between print publishing and web publishing is that print distribution is a linear process, while web-native publishing is dynamic and non-linear, particularly when publishing on a web-native CMS like a blog.

…it’s not about understanding one format, it’s about understanding the WEB. It’s about understanding that putting content on the web isn’t just putting content on a page, same as a printed page — it’s putting content on the NETWORK. It’s understanding that, unlike print publishing where subscriptions control distribution, on the web PEOPLE and LINKS control distribution.

Lots more: http://publishing2.com/2008/01/21/the-only-way-for-journalists-to-understand-the-web-is-to-use-it/

Tags:

2 Comments


UK print brands attract growing overseas audience

comScore reports that the UK’s national newspapers are attracting an increasing number of international readers, with visits to DailyMail.co.uk from users overseas up 153 per cent from a year ago and nearly 60 per cent of visits to BBC sites originating from outside the UK.

The Daily Mail had the highest proportion of international visitors, with 69 percent of its 7.6 million visitors originating from outside the U.K.  The BBC attracted 59 percent of its audience internationally, while the Telegraph (57 percent) and the Guardian Media Group (56 percent) also drew more than half their respective audiences from outside the U.K. Only two of the ten sites studied, British Sky Broadcasting (BSkyB) and ITV Sites, had less than a quarter of their traffic originate internationally.

More: http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2011

Tags:

No Comments


Social networking fans ‘lose’ £6.5bn

Via netimperative, social networking apparently costs UK companies more than £6.5 billion (not million):

 

The recent popularity of social networking sites such as Facebook, MySpace and Bebo are costing UK corporations close to £6.5 billion annually in lost productivity, according to a poll.

The study, conducted by Information security consultancy – Global Secure Systems (GSS) and Infosecurity Europe 2008, was carried out amongst 776 office workers.

More: http://www.netimperative.com/news/2008/january/21/social-networking-costing-firms-a36.5bn

Tags: ,

No Comments


Facebook on your Nokia phone

Via Jemima Kiss at the Guardian (and in turn via paidContent.org), Facebook is coming soon to a phone near you. Be afraid. Be very afraid:

Facebook is negotiating with Nokia over a mobile tool that could see the social networking site built into hundreds of thousands of phone handsets. The Finland-based mobile firm is said to be exploring ways of promoting a mobile version of Facebook through specific handsets in the same way that YouTube features on Apple’s iPhone, website paidContent said today.

Nokia is also reported to be negotiating with Facebook about buying a small stake in the company and an unnamed executive confirmed that “a partnership is in the works”. Both developments would give Facebook a healthy foothold in the mobile market.

More: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jan/21/digitalmedia.mediabusiness?gusrc=rss&feed=media

And: http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-nokia-and-facebook-working-on-mobile-deal-could-involve-investment/

Tags: ,

No Comments


The darker side of citizen journalism

Via Mother Jones, citizen journalism gets a bad press:

…the newspaper industry’s embrace of “citizen journalism” has a downside. Reader-submitted content rarely gets vetted by editors. In the same month as Getz’s Wal-Mart post, the Democrat published a story by a retirement home’s development director about the complex’s great new golf course—without disclosing her job—and a woman wrote an article about a boy who’d organized a cancer charity event without noting that she’s his mom. This may sound like small-time stuff, but it exemplifies the self-defeating side effects of newspapers’ new strategy for survival.

More: http://www.motherjones.com/arts/feature/2008/01/stop-the-presses.html

Tags:

No Comments


AFP reporters barred from using Wikipedia and Facebook as sources

Via Journalism.co.uk, AFP reporters can no longer use ‘virtual’ sources:

Agence France Presse (AFP) has banned its journalists from using Facebook and Wikipedia as sources, the agency’s London bureau chief told a Lord’s Committee yesterday. In response to a question from the Lord’s Committee on Media Ownership and the News about the trustworthiness of online sources, Pierre Lesourd said that internal rules that governed the entire organisation prevented journalists from relying on many new ‘virtual’ sources for news.

“We have internal rules that are regularly updated [on this matter]. Wikipedia for example, we have a written rule inside the company that forbids any journalist using Wikipedia,” he said.

More: http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/530941.php

Tags: ,

No Comments



SetPageWidth