<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>GeorgeHopkin.com &#187; Comment &amp; Opinion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.georgehopkin.com/category/comment-and-opinion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.georgehopkin.com</link>
	<description>"What's next? New new media?"</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:04:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Why Web 2.0 must die</title>
		<link>http://www.georgehopkin.com/2008/05/05/156/why-web-20-must-die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgehopkin.com/2008/05/05/156/why-web-20-must-die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 07:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgehopkin.com/2008/05/05/why-web-20-must-die/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FWIW, I&#8217;ve decided I&#8217;m going to do my best to stop referring to &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; while talking to colleagues and contacts and openly object to any references to &#8220;Web 3.0&#8243;.
It&#8217;s just &#8220;the web&#8221; &#8211; if we stick with the &#8220;Web x.0&#8243; naming convention, are we going to eventually see &#8220;Web 9.0&#8243;? Or even &#8220;Web 9.2.4&#8243;?
Or will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FWIW, I&#8217;ve decided I&#8217;m going to do my best to stop referring to &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; while talking to colleagues and contacts and openly object to any references to &#8220;Web 3.0&#8243;.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just &#8220;the web&#8221; &#8211; if we stick with the &#8220;Web x.0&#8243; naming convention, are we going to eventually see &#8220;Web 9.0&#8243;? Or even &#8220;Web 9.2.4&#8243;?</p>
<p>Or will we switch to &#8220;Web Vista&#8221;? &#8220;Web Leopard&#8221;? How about &#8220;Web <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_(Linux_distribution)#Releases" target="_blank">Intrepid Ibex</a>&#8220;?</p>
<p>The point-oh naming system has emerged because software people need to get a handle on the web.</p>
<p>The rest of us couldn&#8217;t give a tuppenny bit, we just want it to work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgehopkin.com/2008/05/05/156/why-web-20-must-die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Apps &#8211; their place in our future</title>
		<link>http://www.georgehopkin.com/2007/09/09/14/google-apps-their-place-in-our-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgehopkin.com/2007/09/09/14/google-apps-their-place-in-our-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 19:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comment & Opinion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgehopkin.com/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While moving house recently &#8211; and between ISP &#8211; I&#8217;ve relied a great deal more than usual on Gmail. It&#8217;s a walk in the park to have Gmail access your existing non-Gmail email accounts and even send from those accounts via Gmail.
 And this has lead to a lot more use of Google Apps, which I&#8217;ve [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While moving house recently &#8211; and between ISP &#8211; I&#8217;ve relied a great deal more than usual on Gmail. It&#8217;s a walk in the park to have Gmail access your existing non-Gmail email accounts and even send from those accounts via Gmail.</p>
<p> And this has lead to a lot more use of Google Apps, which I&#8217;ve discovered are a joy to use.</p>
<p>Later this month I&#8217;ll be switching my mobile from Orange pay-as-you-go to T-Mobile&#8217;s Web &#8216;n&#8217; Walk, and it occurs to me that at that point I&#8217;ll be able to use all of Google&#8217;s good stuff for about half what I currently pay for plain phone access with Orange.</p>
<p> I just need to settle on the best phone to use the web access &#8211; if anyone knows if the Blackberry is the one to go for, or there&#8217;s another model I should be going for, do drop me a line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgehopkin.com/2007/09/09/14/google-apps-their-place-in-our-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
